바로가기 메뉴
컨텐츠 바로가기
주메뉴 바로가기
하단정보 바로가기
전체메뉴보기

전체메뉴보기

전체메뉴닫기
아카이브

논문

  • 홈
  • 아카이브
  • 인문DB
  • 학술연구
  • 논문
  • 네이버 블로그 공유하기
  • 페이스북 공유하기
  • 트위터 공유하기
  • 구글 플러스 공유하기
  • 카카오 스토리 공유하기

1930년대 리얼리즘 소설에 나타나 문학적 대응 양상 - 『삼대』와 『고향』을 중심으로

저자
김승종
서지
국제어문학회, 국제어문 26
발간일
2002
조회수
1453
SNS 공유
네이버 블로그 공유하기 페이스북 공유하기 트위터 공유하기 구글 플러스 공유하기 카카오 스토리 공유하기
This paper focuses on dialogic nature of Sam-dae(written by Yem Sang-sub) & Ko-hyang (written by Lee Ki-hyeng). These novels are classic korean realism novels in 1930's. The former stands neutral and nationalism. On the again the latter stands socialism. Sam-dae deals with conflicts between three generations & two ideologies. Jo Wee-kwan corresponds to first generation. He insists on Confucianism. He moves tombs of his ancestors to disguise his ignoble identity, and bought a government post illegally. He even amender his family tree. Actually he is not nobel. He just assume nobel by his money. He insists confucianism to propagandize his family. The Writer points that korean people earn money not for himself or society but for his family. Because family is most important to korean confucian people. Jo Wee-kwan exclude his son, Sang-hoon. * Jeonju University - 28 - Because Sang-hoon is Christian. He criticize father's confucianism. And he asserts to use money for society, especially education to get the national independence. But he fails on his attempts. He even went to the bad in morality. Jo Duck-ki is Sang-hoon's son. He thought that his father fails because of losing two basement. One basement is family, and another basement is money. Duck-ki respects his grandfather's will, and succeed his grandfather's property. But he doesn't succeed confucianism. He helps socialist and poor men. He uses money not for his family like his grandfather, but for society like his father. He doesn't go to bad like his father. He admit other's different thought and angle. And he endeavor to help men who need his money or sympathy. Sometimes he criticize himself. But he wouldn't struggle against imperialism actively. Therefore this novel has negative dialogic nature. Kim He-joon is hero of Kohyang. He also criticize himself like Duck-ki. But he isn't negative. He leads farmer's union, and struggle against bourgeois to get farmers interest and to defence farmer's rights. None the less this novel is ruled by author's ideology, socialism. He-joon has dialogic nature, but another characters are ruled by particular author's ideology. Therefore this novel has duplicity.
이전글
김동리ㆍ황순원 문학의 비교 고찰-전통과 근대의 관계를 중심으로
다음글
김성달 집안의 문학적 공간과 교유